Fake Facebook Pages Can Violate CAN-SPAM Act

Creating fake Facebook pages for an advertising campaign can be a violation of the CAN-SPAM Act and the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA), a California Federal court found. MaxBounty, Inc., through a network of affiliates, creates fake Facebook pages intending to redirect unsuspecting Facebook users away from Facebook.com to third-party commercial sites.  These third-party sites […]
Continue Reading

Bugged Teddy Bear Violates Wiretap Act

A former wife who bugged a teddy bear to record her ex’s conversations with their child violated the federal Wiretap Act, a Nebraska district court ruled. Dianna Divingnzzo wanted to obtain full custody of her daughter, Ellenna, so she planted a recording device in her then 4-year-old daughter’s teddy bear. She then told her ex-husband […]
Continue Reading

ZIP Code Is Protected Personal Information

An individual’s ZIP code is personally identifiable information that cannot be recorded and kept by California retailers as part of a credit card transaction, the California Supreme Court ruled. Under California law, it is illegal for a business to request “personal identification information” during a credit card transaction and keep it. Among the examples of […]
Continue Reading

State Cannot Get Titles Sold by Amazon

Amazon.com does not have to turn over information to North Carolina tax officials that would link individual users to the specific books and videos purchased online, a federal court ruled. The North Carolina Revenue Department made several requests to Amazon for information concerning online sales made to North Carolina residents so that the state could […]
Continue Reading

Talk With Reporter After Meeting Protected by Anti-SLAPP

Comments made by a condominium association president following a public meeting with a Chicago alderman is protected by the Illinois Citizen Participation Act. As a result, the defendant can recover attorneys’ fees under the Illinois anti-SLAPP statute even where the defamation case was dismissed because the underlying statement was not actionable. A condominium developer sued the […]
Continue Reading

Court Explains Limits On Internet Personal Jurisdiction

A doctor in Texas with a website soliciting customers only in Houston can’t be sued in Illinois, but the Arizona-based GoDaddy Group, with a national advertising campaign, can. The Seventh Circuit explained the limits of personal jurisdiction in two recent cases, both involving the federal Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act. In the case of the doctor, […]
Continue Reading

HP Sues Hurd For Taking Oracle Job

Hewlett-Packard Company has sued Mark Hurd, HP’s former chairman and president, for breach of contract and threatened misappropriation of trade secrets for taking the position of co-president of Oracle Corporation. The HP complaint seeks to enjoin Hurd from taking the position with Oracle, a competitor, “in which he will serve in a capacity that will make it […]
Continue Reading

Stolen Valor Act Unconstitutionally Criminalizes Merely Lying

The Stolen Valor Act is unconstitutional because it imposes a criminal penalty for merely uttering a false statement of fact without anything more, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals found In a 2-1 decision, the majority said, while Congress has an interest in preserving the integrity of honoring military men and women, the Act’s speech […]
Continue Reading

Addicted Online Game Player Can Sue Creator

An online game player, who admits he became addicted to playing Lineage II, can continue his lawsuit against the game’s creator and distributor for defamation, negligence, gross negligence, and negligent infliction of emotional distress. Craig Smallwood contends that the creator and distributor of the game were negligent in failing to inform players that the game […]
Continue Reading

Toyota Cannot Prevent Use of Lexus In Auto Brokers’ Domain Names

Toyota’s attempt to prevent two auto brokers from using “Lexus” as part of their domain name has come to a screeching halt at the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. The court ruled that an injunction against the auto brokers was too broad because it prohibited the brokers from using the term “Lexus” in its domain […]
Continue Reading